[eresi-dev] Change request in libasm

[ceb]

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:48:25PM +0100, Julien Vanegue wrote:
> HI there,
> 
> I think we should have : instr->op[nbr] instead of instr->op1/2/3. It makes
> programming eresi scripts easier to deal with all operands of an 
> instruction,
> whatever the number of operand it has (using a foreach ... of 0 until 
> $instr.opnbr)
> 
> It is feasible to have an array of operands instead of op1/op2/op3 ?
> 
> Also that will help us to support in the future architecture with more 
> than 3
> possible operands per instructions.
> 
> Is there any reason why its not using an array ?
> 
> -may
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eresi-dev mailing list
> eresi-dev at lists.einherjar.de
> http://lists.einherjar.de/mailman/listinfo/eresi-dev

There is no problem for that.
It was not an array ... because ... 
No reason i can remember :)
I will take a look at what should be modified and how to change that.

-- 
heroine